priorwaltering: benafflecksgf: benafflecksgf: you: I want a sugar daddy me, an intellectual: i...

[strix_alba]

via http://ift.tt/2dZYcq9:
priorwaltering:

benafflecksgf:

benafflecksgf:

you: I want a sugar daddyme, an intellectual: i have a need for a glucose father

everyone reblogging this and saying its “sucrose.” listen you clowns. listen. i don’t give a mcfuckadoodle doo about your correct terminology you science SJW freaks. it’s glucose or fucking die

the people reblogging and saying “sucrose” are actually working with a shallow understanding of the concept of sugar. sucrose is, specifically, table sugar. but “sugar” is a term for a family of molecules, including glucose. just because it’s a simple sugar that one is unlikely to find in a kitchen doesn’t make it less applicable for use in this post. sucrose isn’t “sugar”, it’s a sugar, as are glucose, fructose, galactose, maltose, and lactose. you could use any of these and the post’s internal logic would hold up. nowhere in the phrase “sugar daddy” does it indicate that we’re referring to a table sugar daddy. the original post is scientifically sound